educationNov 19, 20251:21:27pending

SCOTUS Oral Argument: Rutherford v. United States – First Step Act & Compassionate Release

Get every episode summarized

Each time Crime Talk with Scott Reisch publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

About this episode

Full audio of the Supreme Court oral argument in Rutherford v. United States (No. 24-820), argued November 12, 2025. In this case, the Justices consider whether federal judges may treat nonretroactive sentencing changes in the First Step Act—including the end of mandatory "stacking" under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)—as "extraordinary and compelling reasons" to grant compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Listen as the Court presses both sides on sentencing disparities, the Sentencing Commission's new policy statement, and what fairness looks like for people serving decades-long terms under outdated law.

Check out the official Crime Talk merch at the Crime Talk Store: scottreisch.com/crime-talk-store

#RutherfordvUnitedStates #SCOTUS #SupremeCourt #FirstStepAct #SentencingReform #CrimeTalk

Get every episode summarized

Each time Crime Talk with Scott Reisch publishes, we email you a written briefing from the transcript — the topics, who appeared, and any specific claims, with the ad reads skipped.

Email me new episodes

Free for 3 shows. No card needed.

Know when Paul Clement turns up

Follow Paul Clement and once a week we email you every new episode they appeared on — including guest spots the show notes never mention, because we read the transcript.

Follow Paul Clement

Free. Pick your own day and time.

Or alert me on every mention of this name →